I feel like a castaway in a sea of glossy black plastic, chrome, and glowing blue buttons. Do we really need every piece of electronics to look the same, sandwiched in this shiny ebony that is the 21st Century beige?
I go to buy a TV and my head spins out of boredom, making me sick. What the hell happened to industrial design? Most products have no character or soul. Some people argue that, to recover their character, we need to get electronics back into furniture.
But we passed that phase in the 60s. That’s not the way we are going to put character back into our gadgets. Although maybe… maybe there’s no way to get the character back. Maybe the digitalization and miniaturization has killed the gadgets’ soul forever.
Don’t embarass me in front of my house guests
I want affordable gadgets and AV equipment that perform great but also look good. By that I mean something that I can put next to my furniture and make it a real part of my house, not a glossy attachment, as if Kal-El dropped a bloody Krypton crystal in my living room, making a shiny plastic appendix grow out of a walnut table. Except the appendix is actually made of some polymer, gets full of finger prints within a minute of getting out of the box, and doesn’t make an holographic Marlon Brando appear in my living room.
Some will suggest that a handful of high end manufacturers that make beautiful products. Products that perform amazingly well and are beautiful. They use materials like natural wood, leather, ceramics, and metal. They serve a function. They are very pretty. The problem is that they are also extremely expensive, because they are usually made in small quantities and cater to the highest end of the market.
This wasn’t always the case. In the 30s, the Bauhaus promoted good design for the masses. They achieved that, combining good design with mass manufacturing, creating products that still look good today. During the 60s, companies like Braun re-invented themselves by applying good design to their products and selling them at affordable prices. They were the first who moved from electronics that looked like furniture to electronics that actually looked like machines. But in that process, they didn’t take the soul out of their products. They kept their character and fit into the surroundings of a nice home.
Going against the current
Today, everything looks like machines, but that character is gone.
I’m not proposing that every single product out there should look like a Dieter Rams design or an Apple product. All the contrary. Back when Steve Jobs came to Apple, he and Jon Ive introduced the computer that saved Apple from irrelevance and brought the company back in the spotlight. It was the “Bondi” iMac, and it spawned a million clones, from computers to gadgets to peripherals to home appliances. Its translucent white-and-turquoise skin became the beige of the late 90s and early Aughts. It worked for Apple, because it was their design code, which they kept evolving. But the rest just looked ridiculous and cheap. The copies had no character. Or they had the character of being cheap knockoffs. They were both made of plastic, though. Maybe part of having character is being an original.
Later, the iPhone had a similar effect. But while Apple kept developing their own design language—which peaked with the iPad’s industrial design, the rest of the industry kept copying, introducing those elements in many products, but going for the cheap. There’s little differences out there. Companies like Philips actually try to make some different things—like their high-end Aurea TVs—but their main lines are all the same as everyone’s else. Other small companies, like Geneva Lab, try to follow the example of designers like Dieter Rams, but their products are not as inexpensive as the big names in electronics.
The temporary solution: Retrofit the old
The only good solution I’ve been able to come up with: Get old stuff in eBay and modernize them with new components. Or perhaps creating replicas from scratch, like this one:
It feels a bit like cheating and bastardizing the originals, but it also feel like the only possible solution, now that the original cases are considered both rare and gorgeous and are made of lasting and romantic materials like steel and wood. There’s a problem: It can get pretty expensive, like this Braun Atelier Speaker L1:
Still, a lot cheaper than a super-high end AV component. And you can find lower cost gems, like this TS45 radio receiver, which could be a good base for a custom Pandora or Spotify radio:
Or maybe turning the classic Snow White’s Coffin into a multimedia powerhouse—including Blu-Ray player and hard drive storage—connected to a projector via HDMI:
Maybe a company can do the retrofitting and sell the finished products at an affordable price. But they will likely end being a lot more expensive, so I’m afraid we will have to do it ourselves. The other problem with this solution is that design would lose its meaning. The pieces will look good, but they will be bastard hybrids in which buttons and dials lose their original meaning. Which may or may not help a piece’s character.
A dark and glossy future
Why don’t manufacturers push design forward and experiment with other materials and designs? It’s not because it’s significantly more expensive. The answer, I believe, is that being different has a high risk. And very few companies like to take real risks. Manufacturers are quite happy to keep churning out their indigestible sausages, and people will keep buying the glossy black plastic, the chrome, and the glowing blue buttons.
But maybe there’s another explanation: Maybe this is all caused by the fact that electronics are now all digital and getting simpler, thinner, and smaller every day. Perhaps this de-humanizaton of hardware design is obligatory. Perhaps the hardware has to lose the character and soul of analog designs to become just clear slabs of glass. As the human interface migrates from buttons, dials, and knobs to touchscreens and modal software interfaces, this could be the real reason why gadgets are losing their character.
Still, I like to believe that some companies will come up with a solution. I have the feeling that the key is in the materials—wood, leather, metal—which could make these products more human and more durable. Sadly, companies seem to be more interested in producing almost-disposable gadgets, so they can keep selling replacements every two years.
Maybe this is the price we have to pay for progress.
I’m not sure I agree with you completely. Yeah, lots of things are a glossy black with silver accents, that’s on trend. But I actually really like the design of my new Sony receiver. I like the look of my friend’s Samsung LCD TV – my own Panasonic is covered in cheap silver plastic that never looked good, but his TV is nice – and I like the design of my fat PS3 the more I look at it. I even like the design of my cheap as dirt Samsung phone, or my Logitech mouse with its black with silver accent line. Not to say everything I own is sexy – the remotes are all awful button disasters – but the look of some of the equipment appeals to me, and I’m not averse to gloss black and chrome.
Actually, from the examples selected, are you sure you just don’t like black things? All the examples chosen have wood and light colors. Personally, I dislike silver gadgets as a rule and often prefer darker shades, so I don’t mind that gloss black is on trend.
Then again, maybe this is because I’m familiar with car audio, and the complete disregard for aesthetics which is inherent. Your standard aftermarket deck has about a billion flashing lights of different colors, an obnoxious screen, hard to use tiny buttons and a shape designed to not actually blend in to your interior. Relative that, gadget design isn’t so bad.